Editorial | Our choices on local ballot measures
In the News
- Nov 3, 2022
- 1 min
Letter | Yes on O means ‘yes’ on making correct decisions
- Nov 3, 2022
- 4 min
We have businesses in downtown Santa Cruz and we support Measure O
- Nov 3, 2022
- 4 min
Vote yes on O to renovate our library where it is and stop the city’s misguided project
- Nov 3, 2022
- 1 min
Letter | Tree removal notice for Lot 4 a ‘shameful … stunt’
- Nov 3, 2022
- 1 min
Guest Commentary | On city planning for Downtown Santa Cruz and Measure O
- Nov 3, 2022
- 1 min
Letter | Explain the Santa Cruz notice to remove Lot 4 trees
- Nov 3, 2022
- 1 min
Letter | Friends of Library should not be playing politics
- Nov 3, 2022
- 1 min
Letter | All county residents should vote on library
- Nov 3, 2022
- 1 min
Letter | Lot 4 is the ideal spot for the Farmers Market
- Nov 3, 2022
- 1 min
Letter | Brunner diminished office with column against O
- Nov 3, 2022
- 1 min
Letter | Follows the money trail in making voting decisions
- Nov 3, 2022
- 1 min
Letter | Hoodwinked by politicians again on library project
- Nov 3, 2022
- 1 min
Letter | Yes on Measure O: Consider the birds
- Nov 3, 2022
- 1 min
Editorial | About our Editorial Board choices on local races and measures
- Nov 3, 2022
- 1 min
Letter | Reaction to Santa Cruz mayor’s column on Measure O
- Nov 3, 2022
- 1 min
Letter | Stop the ‘Frankenlibrary’ and restore existing library
- Nov 1, 2022
- 1 min
Editorial | Our choices on local ballot measures
- Nov 1, 2022
- 1 min
Letter | Yes on O; stop latest bureaucrat-driven outrage
- Nov 1, 2022
- 1 min
Letter | Vote Yes on O – but non-city residents left out